Listen Live on  
 

WOR 710

New York's New 710, WOR
 
 

Federal Court Delays Stop & Frisk Reform & Removes Judge For Bias

 
Federal Court Delays Stop & Frisk Reform & Removes Judge For Bias
Posted November 1st, 2013 @ 7:19am

(Christopher Robbins) A panel of federal judges has granted New York City's request to delay court-ordered reforms in the federal stop and frisk trial and has also removed Judge Shira Scheindlin from the case, citing bias.

In removing Judge Scheindlin from the case, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit writes [PDF]:

"Upon review of the record in these cases, we conclude that the District Judge ran afoul of the Code of Conduct for United States Judges, Canon 2 (“A judge should avoid impropriety and the appearance of impropriety in all activities.”); see also Canon 3(C)(1) (“A judge shall disqualify himself or herself in a proceeding in which the judge’s impartiality might reasonably be questioned . . . .”), and that the appearance of partiality surrounding this litigation was compromised by the District Judge’s improper application of the Court’s “related case rule,” see Transfer of Related Cases, S.D.N.Y. & E.D.N.Y. Local Rule 13(a), and by a series of media interviews and public statements purporting to respond publicly to criticism of the District Court."

The panel of three judges, John M. Walker, Jr., José A. Cabranes,and Barrington D. Parker, cite comments made by Judge Scheindlin in 2007, as well as articles in the Times, the New Yorker, and the Associated Press, in which Judge Scheindlin calls comments made about her impartiality by NYPD Commissioner Ray Kelly and Mayor Bloomberg as "below the belt."

Read More: Gothamist

Photo Credit: Getty Images

Recommended Stories

More from WOR 710

*